Roger G. Worthington P.C.   |   800.831.9399  |  Search  
   
Helping Asbestos Victims Get Justice in the Courtrooms and Help in the Hospitals since 1990.

Expand All | Contract All Empower Yourself: Free Medical/Legal Guide

-PATIENT PROFILES -California State Rock -Empower Yourself -PHLBI -Mesothelioma -Meso Causation -Meso Diagnosis -Treatment Options -Treatment Centers -Litigation -Settlements/Verdicts -Patient Advocacy -Asbestos Products -Legislative Updates -Meso Hotspots -Lung Cancer -Why You Need RGWPC -Web Links
 
 

Listen to Dr. Cameron speak about his surgery plus interferon trial
Click here

 

Free Legal and Medical Packet

Click Here
1- 800-831-9399

 

THE REAL DEAL

Meso lawyers since 1996.
First on the Internet.
First to post treatment options.

BEWARE OF FAKES

 
 

 

Surgical Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: a Systematic Review and Evidence Summary
 

Maziak, et al, Lung Cancer (2005) 48, 157—169

(excerpts from the above article, for a full review of the article, click here.)

Summary From 1985 to 2004, Group evaluated published articles re management of mesothelioma using surgery. No randomized controlled trials comparing pleurectomy (PL) with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or comparing surgery with an alternative treatment were identified.

Conclusions: The role of surgery in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma cannot be precisely defined as the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials makes it impossible to determine whether the use of EPP or PL improves survival or effectively palliates the symptoms of the disease. Future studies of the role of surgery in the treatment of mesothelioma should include evaluations of quality of life.

1. Introduction The two main surgical treatment approaches are pleurectomy (PL) and extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). The former procedure generally involves excision ofsections ofthe pleura. The latter procedure is a more aggressive approach, which involves the removal ofall or part ofa lung, as well as the parietal pleura, ipsilateral pericardium, and diaphragm. This evidence summary focuses on the role of surgery, specifically PL and EPP, in the treatment of diffuse and localized malignant mesothelioma, for which, no widely accepted standard of care currently exists.

* * *

5. Conclusions Because ofthe lack of sufficient high-quality evidence on the surgical management of mesothelioma, the Lung DSG opinion is that: . The role ofs urgery in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma cannot be precisely defined. Specifically, the lack ofr andomized controlled clinical trials makes it impossible to determine whether the use o fEPP or PL improves the survival of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or effectively palliates the symptoms of the disease. . In the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma, limited data exist to support the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for palliation in some patients. .... . All future studies of the role of surgery in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma should report study selection criteria and operative morbidity and mortality data. . Future studies of the role of surgery in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma need to include evaluations of quality of life.

Sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry ofHealth and Long-term Care.

*** POSTED JANUARY 16, 2006 ***

 
site map   free brochure   disclaimer   800.831.9399   contact us   home