|
As most of you know, Senator Daschle has
made a proposal to Senator Frist to create a $145 billion trust fund.
We have learned that Senator Daschle made this proposal in response to
demands from several members of his Caucus, who have asked him to take
the lead in dealing with Frist on this issue. As of today, Frist has
not responded to the offer and there are indications that the insurers
and other factions within the business community are not going to
support the Daschle proposal. The AFL-CIO has responded publicly that
it will not support any fund that does not contain at least $149 billion
in funding.
As of this moment, Daschle’s proposal is
only a verbal offer with several of the following principles, from which
Daschle has indicated he will not back down:
- $141 billion from defendants and
insurers, plus $4 billion from the bankruptcies. As the Daschle
proposal does not allow completed bankruptcies to be a part of the
Fund, this principle increases the front-end burden on the defendants
by $4 billion.
- $42 billion in up-front funding to be
paid in the first 3 – 5 years. Of course, we agree with the AFL-CIO
that this fund needs $42 billion in the first 3 years, not 5.
- most of the current claimants will be
able to proceed with their claim in court until the Fund is fully
operational and all statute of limitations are tolled during the life
of the Fund
- the Daschle proposal incorporates the
values at the level proposed by the AFL-CIO in early May, with
mesothelioma victims receiving $1.1 million and FELA and Jones Act
workers will retain their workers compensation rights under those
acts. Also, claimants will be able to prove their occupational
exposure by sworn affidavit.
- the Fund would sunset immediately if
it becomes insolvent and claimants can return to the tort system, with
venue either in Federal court or the state court where the injury
occurred or the victim resides.
I will be sure to keep you apprised of
developments. The Senate is in recess for the July 4th holiday. Please
contact your Senators as they spend time in the state to express your
opposition to any Fund that does not fully and swiftly compensate the
victims of asbestos exposure.
Sincerely,
Linda Lipsen
Senior Vice President for Public Affairs,
ATLA
***
POSTED JULY 1, 2004 ***
|