Doctor-Patient Alliance for Responsible Asbestos Cancer Policy
www.phlbi.org
June 30, 2005
Via Regular U.S. Mail and Email
The Honorable «First» «Last» «Party_State»
«Address»
Washington, D.C. 20510
|
Re:
|
SB 852 Must
Award Damages Commensurate with Costs, Compensate Victims Swiftly
and Increase Medical Research Funding for Asbestos-Related Cancers |
Dear Senator «Last»:
We are an alliance of doctors and patients, brought together by
our mission to defeat mesothelioma as a life-ending disease.
Mesothelioma is a fatal tumor that generally develops 20-40 years
after exposure to asbestos. We are intimately familiar with the
financial, medical, physical and psychological hardships to which
mesothelioma patients and their families are subjected.
As discussed in detail in the attached policy paper, we believe
SB 852 as drafted contains serious flaws that should be rectified.
The $1.1 million cap is insufficient to meet the medical,
hospital, travel, lodging and other costs of mesothelioma patients who
pursue the best treatments, which include surgery, chemotherapy,
radiation, or a combination of therapies. Moreover, it is
insufficient to address the ongoing medical costs of patients who
survive long enough to outlive the median survival time but who remain
disabled and unable to earn a living. The bill therefore
discriminates against early stage, usually younger, patients whose
life-long medical costs are certain to exceed the $1.1 million cap.
We are also concerned that the bill does not realistically
insure that the asbestos trust fund will be financially able to
swiftly compensate the sickest of the sick. In order to beat the
grim survival odds, mesothelioma patients, especially the uninsured,
will need to have the financial means to pursue and afford novel and
sometimes radical treatment options. Many patients, faced with
the financial and medical hardships, may simply opt for palliative
treatments.
Finally, while we applaud the government's recognition of the
need to jointly fund with industry a comprehensive mesothelioma
treatment and research program, we are deeply concerned about the
levels of the funding as well as the commitment. Mesothelioma
research has long been neglected, even though about one-third of the
patients contracted their asbestos exposure while serving in the U.S.
Navy. Moreover, we are concerned that unless key senators take
the proper steps to appropriate the federal dollars to the National
Institutes of Health, the program will exist on paper only as yet
another federal "unfunded mandate."
We are encouraged by the effort to globally compensate victims
of asbestos exposure and provide long overdue research funding for
this neglected, orphan asbestos-related cancer. However, we
remain seriously concerned about whether the legislation, as drafted,
will fairly and timely compensate mesothelioma patients and provide
the best hope through research. At a minimum, the Fund should
allow seriously injured “hardship” claimants to present evidence of
their economic and medical losses and award damages accordingly.
Respectfully,
The Doctor-Patient Alliance for Responsible
Asbestos Cancer Policy
This letter was signed by 34
surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, pulmonary or other medical
doctors who specialize in treating and diagnosing mesothelioma
patients nationwide.
Over 11,800 U.S. Citizens have signed the petition calling on
our federal government to fund a mesothelioma research and treatment
program. www.marf.org.
The attached policy
paper can be viewed on the web at
www.phlbi.org.
Enclosure