|
American Journal of Industrial Medicine,
2002 Mar; 41(3):188-201
Rebutting the misrepresentation that
chrysotile asbestos does not cause mesothelioma, a 2002 article
published by the Center for Occupational and Environmental Health,
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine in Sydney,
Australia reviewed mesothelioma in that country between 1945-2000.
The review, based on a national
malignant mesothelioma case registry begun in 1980, noted a marked
increase in the incidence of mesothelioma in the last twenty years.
The article concluded that Australia’s high incidence of
mesothelioma is related to high past asbestos use of all fiber types
across a wide spectrum of occupational and environmental settings.
This conclusion directly rebuts the claim of defense lawyers and
asbestos manufacturers that mesothelioma is caused by some fiber
types and not by others.
The article chronicled the scope of
the asbestos epidemic in Australia, and predicted that the number of
cases is expected to reach 18,000 by 2020, with about 11,000 yet to
appear. Currently 450-600 cases are notified annually in a
population of 20 million. The review used registry data to calculate
time trends in mesothelioma incidence. The article analyzes
incidence by age, sex, anatomical site, and state of notification,
and describes the association of occupational and environmental
asbestos exposure histories. Australia has the highest number of
reported mesothelioma cases in the world.
Citation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=11920963
*** POSTED
APRIL 25, 2007
***
|