|
Board of Directors
Robert B. Cameron, M.D.
UCLA Medical School
Nicholas J. Vogelzang, M.D.
University of Chicago
Brian Loggie, M.D.
Creighton University Medical Center
Michael Harbut, M.D., M.P.H.
Royal Oak, Michigan
Roger G. Worthington, Esq.
Dallas, Texas
Mathew Bergman, Esq.
Seattle, Washington
Susan Vento
St. Paul, Minnesota
Mouzetta Zumwalt-Weathers
Cary, North Carolina
In Memoriam
Congressman Bruce F. Vento
Bill Powell
Science Advisory Board
Harvey Pass, M.D., Chairman
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Victor Roggli, M.D.
Duke University
Robert N. Taub, M.D.
Columbia University
Lary A. Robinson, M.D.
H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center
Steve Hahn, M.D.
University of Pennsylvania
Joseph R. Testa, Ph. D.
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Claire Verschraegen, M.D.
University of New Mexico
Eric Vallieres, M.D.
University of Washington
Dan Miller, M.D.
Emory University
Raphael Bueno, M.D.
Harvard/Brigham and Women's
Hedy Lee Kindler, M.D.
University of Chicago
W. Roy Smythe, M.D.
M.D. Anderson/University of Texas
Executive Director
Christopher E. Hahn
Santa Barbara, California
MARF, inc.
1609 Garden Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
tel (805) 560-8942
fax (805) 560-8962
c-hahn@marf.org
http://www.marf.org
|
Our Mission is to eradicate mesothelioma as a
life-ending disease.
Recommendation for a National Mesothelioma
Research and Treatment Program - Description and
Legislative Language
The battle to ease the misery of the U.S.' mesothelioma
victims must be along three fronts: early detection
and prevention, laboratory and clinical therapeutic
research, and education. The creation of
geographically appropriate Centers of Mesothelioma
Excellence in Research and Innovative Treatment (MERIT)
through a peer review mechanism will ensure collegial,
interactive excellence, not only to eradicate the disease,
but also to allay the anxieties of the mesothelioma
high-risk populations through development of early
detection and prevention initiatives.
Early Detection and Prevention
The Centers of MERIT must collaborate with each other in
order to investigate the early detection of the
disease. The early detection studies should aim
specifically to detect intermediate markers which point to
the development of the disease in high-risk
individuals, defined as those with a significant
exposure to asbestos. These individuals could be targeted
through collaborations with environmental and occupational
health private or university practices, unions, or other
groups which tend to the health needs of or advocate for
such individuals, and the early detection studies should
concentrate on the recording of careful epidemiologic and
environmental health data.
Intermediate Markers would be defined as
promising, unique genomic or proteomically-defined proteins
or nucleic acid changes which would predict an
increased chance that an individual may develop
mesothelioma. These intermediate markers would be
derived from studies which compare the genomic or proteomic
changes in mesothelioma to appropriate control populations
(other cancers, benign diseases, asbestos exposed but not
diseased individuals) using tissues (normal and tumor) or
body fluids (serum, pleural effusions, ascites) or other
surrogate tissues. These intermediate markers would be
validated in prospective studies of patients in order to
define their accuracy (specificity and sensitivity). Those
intermediate markers which are most promising would be then
used in prospective studies examining their prevalence and
incidence in the above mentioned "high-risk"
individuals. There are already exciting developments in
this arena at institutions associated with MARF.
Obviously, the prevention of mesothelioma is paramount, and
all measures necessary to ban the use of asbestos should be
employed. But the Centers of MERIT must also work to
prevent mesothelioma in individuals who
have already been significantly exposed. Novel
compounds could be developed which, in high-risk
individuals who are found to have elevated intermediate
markers (but no evidence of disease radiographically),
could be tested prospectively to see if these markers
normalize. There are already promising compounds which
could be investigated if the funds were available for such
clinical trials. Parallel with these efforts, we must use
these Centers of MERIT to develop novel imaging techniques
which could alert physicians to the development of changes
in the linings of the chest and abdomen which
precede overt mesothelioma development.
Laboratory and Clinical Therapeutic
Research
The Centers of MERIT must set forth a strategic plan for
grant supported research to develop novel surgical,
chemotherapeutic, radiation-associated, and biologic
strategies, including gene therapy, for the control of
local as well as systemic mesothelioma. Exciting
avenues for such research include a multicenter trial
comparing clinical therapies, further cooperation with
pharmaceutical companies for the easier planning and
recruitment of patients for clinical trials, and
grant-supported research for the development of proper
palliative measures, including pain management,
for patients with mesothelioma. We must develop better
long-acting slow-release analgesis using epidural or
intrathecal implantable devices, which at this time are
prohibitively expensive. We must also be better and more
uniform in our management of local complications of the
disease including pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial
effusions.
Many mesothelioma patients are not affluent. The Centers of
MERIT must formulate a strategic plan to provide a budget
for transportation and lodging of individuals with
mesothelioma. This would enable these patients to fly to
mesothelioma clinical centers for the newest developing
treatment protocols, including pain management. It would
also enable the centers to recruit patients in numbers
sufficient to conduct the necessary clinical trials.
A high priority for funding should be a program which would
allow for newly diagnosed cases of mesothelioma to
be registered (with the patients' consent) to
a web-based prospective registry. The registration of all
such patients would allow for accurate recording of the
magnitude of the disease, make prospective epidemiologic
studies regarding prevalence and incidence easier in the
future, and map trends in the disease in the United States
which could point out other, as yet unknown, etiologic
causes for the disease. This registry would facilitate
communication among centers with established novel
treatment options, and allow physicians to inquire about
eligibility of the patients for such trials. Such a
registry could be located at one central data management
center which not only coordinates the registry, but also,
coordinates all informatics for the cooperative trials of
the Centers of MERIT.
Education
Funds must be allocated for a National Mesothelioma
Awareness Campaign to educate the public
about these new initiatives. Funds should also be allocated
for the training of Clinical Specialists in mesothelioma by
the creation of a fellowship of 1 or 2 years in which the
fellows are exposed to various initiatives at Centers of
MERIT. Such a program would also have a specific didactic
curriculum. Moreover, funds should be allocated for a
yearly International Mesothelioma Symposium to be held at
cities with Centers of MERIT. This conference would
highlight the newest benchwork and clinical advances in the
disease.
We must utilize the power of the Internet and establish an
electronic Mesothelioma Educational Resource Center
("MERC-e"). This resource would be a
"one stop shop" for mesothelioma patients, family
members and front-line physicians to get comprehensive,
current information on mesothelioma. Information and
articles about the disease itself, as well as current
information on all available clinical trials and drugs,
with protocols, eligibility criteria, etc. could be
provided. A discussion group encouraging stories to
overcome hopelessness would be available, along with
information on general financial assistance, insurance
coverage, obtaining VA benefits, pain management, hospice
information, etc.
Proposed legislative language establishing
the National Mesothelioma Research and Treatment Program
follows
MESOTHELIOMA TREATMENT PROGRAMS.
(a) GENERAL-The Director of the NIH, the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense
shall jointly create and administer a National Mesothelioma
Research and Treatment Program (NMRTP), to investigate and
advance the detection, prevention, treatment and cure of
malignant mesothelioma.
The NMRTP shall include a Medical Advisory Board (MAB),
consisting at a minimum of eight medical and scientific
experts and two patient advocates. The purpose of the MAB
is to make recommendations to the NMRTP regarding the
merits of research applications and initiatives - including
applications for designation as a Center of MERIT as
provided in section (b) below, as well as the research and
educational priorities of the NMRTP.
(b) Centers of MERIT-The Director of the
NIH, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of
Defense shall provide through the NMRTP $2,500,000 for each
of fiscal years 2004 through 2008 for ten Centers
of Mesothelioma Excellence in Research and Innovative
Treatment (MERIT) similar to the NIH's
Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPOREs). These
are to be chosen through competitive peer review
application announced with a "Request for
Applications" (RFA). The Centers of MERIT shall
develop programs to address the priorities and issues
described in subsection (c) below.
(c) RESEARCH PRIORITIES-The Centers of
MERIT shall:
(1) be geographically distributed throughout the U.S. with
special consideration given to areas of high incidence of
asbestos-related disease;
(2) be closely associated with Veterans Affairs hospitals
so as to provide research benefit and care to U.S. armed
forces veterans who have suffered excessively from
asbestos-related malignant disease;
(3) be engaged in research to provide mechanisms for
detection and prevention of mesothelioma, palliation of the
disease symptoms -- particularly in the area of pain
management, as well as a cure for mesothelioma;
(4) be engaged in public education about asbestos-related
malignant diseases and prevention, screening, and
treatment.
(5) be full participants in the National Mesothelioma
Registry as described in subsection (e) below, and the
National Mesothelioma Tissue Bank as described in
subsection (f) below.
(6) coordinate their research efforts with the other
Centers of MERIT, and encourage non-MERIT investigators and
institutions involved in exemplary mesothelioma research to
partner in their research efforts with one or more of the
Centers of MERIT.
(d) MESOTHELIOMA REGISTRY AND
TISSUE BANK-The Director
of the NIH, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the
Secretary of Defense shall provide $2,000,000 for each of
fiscal years 2004 through 2008 for the creation,
maintenance and operation of a National Mesothelioma
Registry and Tissue Bank. The Registry, which shall be
known as the Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, Jr., Memorial Registry,
will develop an informational system that addresses the
issues described in subsection (e). The Tissue Bank, which
shall be known as the Congressman Bruce Vento Memorial
Tissue Bank, will address the issues described in
subsection (f) below. At least $500,000 of the total
$2,000,000 per year shall be allocated for the collection
and maintenance of tissue specimens. The director of the
Registry and the
(e) Purpose and Operation of Registry-The
Registry must satisfy the following criteria:
(1) Input of data to the registry must be accessible
through the Internet;
(2) Whether through the Internet or otherwise, inclusion of
data in the Registry must be available for all mesothelioma
patients and physicians throughout the U.S.;
(3) The Registry must respect patient confidentiality and
adhere to all patient privacy laws and regulations;
(4) The Registry must collect data regarding symptoms,
pathology, evaluation, treatment, outcomes, and quality of
life;
(5) Each and every Center of MERIT must participate in the
Registry; and
(6) After ensuring that patient privacy will be absolutely
protected, the Registry must provide data to approved
researchers who apply for such data in order to further the
understanding, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and/or
treatment of malignant mesothelioma.
(f) Purpose and Operation of Tissue
Bank-The Tissue Bank must satisfy the following
criteria:
(1) Inclusion of tissue in the Bank must be available to
all mesothelioma patients and physicians throughout the
U.S.;
(2) Each and every Center of MERIT must participate in the
Tissue Bank;
(3) The Bank must include pre- and post-treatment blood
(serum and blood cells) specimens as well as tissue
specimens from biopsies and surgery;
(4) The Bank must be linked to clinical data regarding the
specimens in such a manner as to adhere to all patient
privacy laws and regulations; and
(5) After ensuring that patient privacy will be absolutely
protected, the Bank must supply tissue samples to approved
researchers who apply for such data in order to further the
understanding, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and
treatment of malignant mesothelioma.
(g) MESOTHELIOMA AWARENESS AND
EDUCATION-The Director of the NIH, the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense shall
provide through the NMRTP $1,000,000 for each of fiscal
years 2004 through 2008 for mesothelioma awareness and
education, to include:
(1) A National Mesothelioma Awareness Campaign to educate
the public about the new initiatives above.
(2) Training of Clinical Specialist Fellows in mesothelioma
.
(3) A yearly International Mesothelioma Symposium to be
held at cities with Centers of MERIT.
(4) An Internet-based electronic Mesothelioma
Educational Resource Center
(MERC-e) providing mesothelioma patients,
family members and front-line physicians with
comprehensive, current information on mesothelioma.
|